I like all activities in Retr-O-Mat. Of course, I do, otherwise I would not have invested the time to add them. Still, when I selected activities for the Print Edition I realized that some activities HAD to be in it and others were interchangeable.
Which are these key activities, you ask? Well, here they are:
Teams new to agile need to learn what to improve, what they can influence and how best to implement change:
- Circle of influence
The team will be most successful if they tackle problems they can influence instead of bitching about things they cannot change
- SMART Goals
A concrete, measurable goal / action item has a much higher chance of being implemented than a nebulous one, that no one knows how to act on
- Low hanging fruit
Start with small steps. Early successes can start a virtuous cycle
- Undercover Boss
Changing perspective: The team’s perspective is not the only one there is. Other views are just as valid.
If you’re new to facilitating retrospectives, here are methods and ideas I keep coming back to:
- Lean Coffee
Lean Coffee is the new black: It goes with everything. It’s my goto-method to facilitate all kinds of unstructured discussions. I even made it the crowning 24th 1-pager in the Wall-Skills advent calendar.
Gather suggestions in the categories “Same of”, “More of” and “Less of”. Can also cover a range of situations, e.g. to give feedback to new new colleagues
Such a powerful method: I’ve seen it break nasty loops so that teams finally find one end of the problem chain to yank on. IMO more suited for real-life complex problems than 5 Whys.
Having many action items lowers the chances of any improvement getting implemented. Boiling it down to very few important ones is key and “Merge” does that nicely.
Written activities are the remedy for teams with silent members
- Physical activities such as Take a Stand or Constellation
Moving raises energy levels and influences how we feel about issues
- Appreciative Inquiry
It doesn’t have to be about problems all the time. You can also concentrate on positive things and still find great improvements. (Diana Larsen has created a retrospective plan with appreciative activities only.)
Very simple yet it always draws out good contributions. I love the metaphor
As a facilitator starting with a new team, you might want to test the waters with:
How do people feel about having retrospectives?
Which activities do you prefer?